Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-comms

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local OS for your AI Agents fleets. ——————- Enables AI agents to coordinate through a durable local board with shared state, ticket lifecycle, evidence-based approvals, and journal-woken handoffs.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to ask the user questions, receive written replies, share files, and hand tasks to other agent sessions — with every cross-agent request routed through human approval first. Sessions register themselves so they can be read, woken, and answered from a phone over a local-first, self-hosted setup.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI coding agents to coordinate on a shared software project by registering, claiming tasks, declaring file intents, publishing structured change reports, and handing off context, with a local dashboard showing state in near real time.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives a hackathon team's AI coding agents and their humans a shared task board and inbox, so agents can atomically claim tasks, move them between todo/doing/blocked/done, post messages to teammates or the whole team, and read new messages plus board events since they last checked. It also exposes member and agent activity, letting multiple agents working in the same repo coordinate without duplicating work.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct operations: register session, post, read unread updates, list threads, set summary, claim/release/update task. The lease trio (claim_task, release_task, update_task) and the two read tools (read_updates vs list_threads) are adjacent in purpose but the descriptions clearly separate lease acquisition from lifecycle transitions and cursor-based reading from thread overview.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools share the board_ prefix with a predictable verb-first pattern (board_claim_task, board_update_task, board_release_task, board_set_summary, board_list_threads). board_register and board_post are slightly shorter but still fit the same scheme and remain perfectly readable, so there is no convention mixing.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a coordination board covering sessions, posts, reads, summaries, and task leases. Each tool maps to a distinct lifecycle step with no redundant operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers session registration, posting/threading, incremental reads, thread listing, summary pinning, and the full task lease lifecycle (claim, renew, release, transition). Minor gaps exist around editing/deleting posts or threads, but core workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues