Resolve alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds valuable behavioral info beyond annotations: it states the no-op behavior for already-resolved alerts and that it returns the alert as-is. It also includes the endpoint. Annotations already cover readOnly/destructive flags, so this extra context is a plus.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with two short sentences and an endpoint reference. The key information is front-loaded ('Resolve alert.') and every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is complete. It explains the action, the idempotent behavior, the return value, and the endpoint, which is enough for an agent to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter 'id', with the description 'The ID of the alert to resolve.' The tool description does not add any additional parameter meaning beyond this, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb and resource: 'Resolve alert' and 'Resolves an active alert'. It is distinct from sibling tools like showAlert or listAlerts, using the specific action 'resolve'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: use it to resolve active alerts, and notes that already-resolved alerts are no-ops. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, so it lacks explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.