add_paragraph

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it is a delegate to python-hwpx and involves reserialization and re-validation after. However, it omits details like whether it overwrites existing files, required permissions, or side effects on the original file.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it packs multiple concepts (delegate, reserialize, re-validate) without clear structure. Could be more readable with separation into two sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description fails to cover important parameters like section_index and does not explain the return value or error conditions. It is incomplete for a tool with 4 parameters and no schema description coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must explain parameter meanings. It only mentions 'text paragraph' but does not clarify path, out_path, or section_index. The schema provides default for section_index but description adds no semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Append' and resource 'a text paragraph', and specifies it writes a NEW file. It distinguishes from sibling tools like add_image or add_table by focusing on paragraph addition and file creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The phrase 'write a NEW file' implies it creates new files rather than modifying existing ones, but no comparison with siblings is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.