Skip to main content
Glama
pbandreddy

BlazeMeter MCP Server

by pbandreddy

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_workspacesC

Get workspaces from a specified account.

get_projectsC

Get projects from a specified workspace.

get_test_runsC

Get test runs (masters) for a specified test.

get_test_run_summaryC

Get the summary report for a specified test run (master).

get_test_run_aggregate_dataC

Get the aggregate report data for a specified test run (master).

get_test_run_errors_dataC

Get the errors report data for a specified test run (master).

get_test_run_thresholdsC

Get the thresholds report for a specified test run (master).

get_test_run_timeline_kpisB

Get the timeline KPIs report for a specified test run (master).

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific resources and report types. The six test run report tools (aggregate_data, errors_data, summary, thresholds, timeline_kpis) each retrieve different data slices without overlap, while get_projects and get_workspaces handle distinct workspace and account-level operations.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and snake_case naming. The naming structure is perfectly predictable: get_[resource]_[optional_specific_data] (e.g., get_test_run_aggregate_data, get_workspaces).

Tool Count4/5

Eight tools is reasonable for a performance testing domain, though slightly thin for complete lifecycle coverage. The tools focus heavily on retrieval operations for test runs and workspaces, which fits the server's apparent monitoring/reporting purpose but might benefit from additional test execution or configuration management tools.

Completeness3/5

The surface provides excellent read-only coverage for test run reports and workspace/project retrieval, but has notable gaps in test creation, execution, and management operations. Agents can query existing data but cannot initiate tests, modify configurations, or perform other essential performance testing workflow actions.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues