Skip to main content
Glama
pavelpikta

lampa-mcp-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to lampa-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that analyzes codebases to provide dependency graphs, impact analysis, and file insights across 15+ programming languages, enabling AI assistants to understand project structure and navigate code efficiently.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables AI assistants to intelligently understand, analyze, edit, navigate, and review software projects with multi-workspace support, Git integration, and semantic search.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that gives AI coding agents structured access to a project's source code, architecture, documentation, and Git context through 16 tools for searching, reading, and comparing evidence without modifying files.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server providing 29 tools across 5 layers for semantic TypeScript/JavaScript code intelligence, enabling AI agents to find references, trace impacts, guard APIs, and explain errors without text-search false positives.
      18 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for local-first code intelligence, providing structural code graph, semantic search, and impact analysis to AI agents.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.8/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct role: overview, content search, path lookup, file read, edit-path resolution, catalog dump, plugin analysis, symbol tracing, planning, patching, scaffolding, validation, or a specific documentation guide. The descriptions actively cross-reference what each tool should not be used for, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as summarize_repo, search_code, find_files, draft_patch, and validate_code. The guide_* and explain_* prefixes create recognizable subfamilies without breaking the overall naming convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools, the surface is slightly above the ideal 3–15 range, but each tool contributes to the snapshot-inspection and plugin-development workflow. The documentation guides could theoretically be consolidated, but their distinct topics make the count acceptable.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full inspection-to-planning lifecycle: orient, search, read, locate, trace, catalog, plan, patch, scaffold, validate, and consult documentation. Write and execute operations are intentionally excluded as snapshot-only behavior, so the surface has no dead ends for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues