A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceProvides a unified interface to access UNHCR's open data across statistics, RDF, and IATI MCP servers, enabling aggregated queries, cross-domain analytics, and dataset discovery.
MIT
UNDP Open Data MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to UNDP Open Data MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying international public procurement data, including government tenders, through the Open Contracting standard.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSearch and query government open-data portals (Socrata SODA API) via MCP.81 npm3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying Australian government tender data via the AusTender OCDS API without requiring an API key.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying nonprofit organization data through the ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer API, providing access to financial and operational information without authentication.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying and summarizing public datasets from any OpenDataSoft Explore v2.1 portal.8MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 15 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools are clearly distinct by resource type (operating units, regions, SDGs, projects, donors), but undp_list_operating_units and undp_get_operating_unit could be confused at first glance, and undp_list_sdgs vs undp_list_sdg_targets are similar in name though distinct in granularity. Overall, descriptions clarify boundaries well.
Naming Consistency4/5
The set follows a consistent undp_verb_noun pattern: list_*, get_*, search_*, aggregate_*. Minor deviation: undp_list_donor_countries is a list but requires a query, and undp_search_donors vs undp_list_donor_countries have overlapping list/search semantics. Still, the pattern is predictable.
Tool Count5/5
15 tools is well within the ideal range for a data-rich open data server. Each tool covers a distinct facet of the UNDP data model (reference lists, project search/detail, aggregation, donor lookup), and none feel redundant or superfluous.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the core domain well: reference data (regions, SDGs, focus areas, sectors), project search and detail, output detail, operating unit portfolios, and aggregate queries. Minor gaps: no direct tool for listing all projects without search filters, and no tool for fetching a specific donor's full profile, but these are workable via existing tools.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues