Skip to main content
Glama
paulieb89

UK Legal Research MCP Server

by paulieb89
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to UK Legal Research MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Lex

      i-dot-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides programmatic access to UK legal documents with hybrid semantic search and Model Context Protocol integration for AI assistants.
      69
      MIT

    • BAILII MCP Server

      paulieb89
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching UK case law on BAILII and retrieving judgments with automatic section extraction (summary, conclusions, etc.). Runs locally to avoid BAILII's cloud IP blocks.
      3
      5
      Apache 2.0

    • Open Legal Compliance MCP

      TCoder920
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and analyze legal documents from multiple jurisdictions including US federal and state law, case law, EU regulations, UK legislation, Canadian law, Congress bills, SEC filings, and FDA data through free government APIs.
      6
      MIT

    • legal-mcp

      jscottym
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables US case law search, citation parsing, practice management via Clio, and federal court filings through PACER.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tool set covers many overlapping domains (e.g., multiple Hansard search tools, multiple case-law retrieval tools), but each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with detailed descriptions that cross-reference others. The potential confusion between parliament_search_hansard and parliament_member_debates is mitigated by explicit guidance on when to use each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All domain tools follow a consistent domain_verb_noun pattern (e.g., case_law_search, legislation_get_toc, parliament_find_member, votes_get_division, citations_resolve, hmrc_get_vat_rate). Generic MCP tools (list_prompts, get_prompt, list_resources, read_resource) follow standard MCP naming conventions. No mixed styles or vague verbs.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 35 tools, the server is over-scoped for a single MCP endpoint. While each tool is narrowly defined, the sheer number makes it difficult for agents to efficiently select the correct one, and many tools could be split into separate servers by domain (parliament, case law, citations, HMRC).

    Completeness5/5

    The server provides comprehensive coverage of UK legal research workflows: case law search and retrieval, legislation navigation, parliamentary debates and members, bills, committees, votes, citation parsing/resolution/formatting, and HMRC guidance. No obvious gaps for research-oriented tasks are apparent; the resource templates further extend access to full documents.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources