Skip to main content
Glama
patsch1
by patsch1

Related Servers

Alternatives to noetrail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with typed tools to bootstrap sessions, ingest files, search, read, write, link, handoff, self-check, and audit markdown notes in a self-hosted Obsidian-compatible vault.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, read, and traverse Markdown note vaults (Obsidian-compatible) with full-text search, backlinks, knowledge graphs, and a persistent memory system for cross-session context.
      16
      13 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides an AI agent with a searchable markdown notes vault, offering tools to create, read, list, search, update, and delete notes stored as plain .md files.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and write to a personal knowledge vault of markdown notes, projects, and tasks, with tooling for search, capture, daily logs, and project management across different AI tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to search and retrieve notes from a local Markdown vault using hybrid keyword/semantic search, and to save typed memories with append and guarded replacement operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to semantically search and retrieve content from a local Markdown vault. Provides tools for fetching specific notes and finding related ones via embeddings and wikilinks.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions (capture vs update vs trash, set_relation vs set_unresolved_relation, get_attachment vs add_attachment vs list_pending_attachments). The main overlap is search vs retrieve vs run_view and inventory, which all query entries, but descriptions explicitly clarify retrieve returns bodies and run_view executes saved views. Boundaries are generally clear enough to select correctly.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    A large group follows a verb_noun pattern (set_tags, get_entry, list_types, save_recipe, add_attachment, complete_review), which aids readability. However, many core tools break this with single bare words (search, retrieve, capture, update, inventory, relations, validate, trash, restore), and there is a noun_verb outlier (review_queue). Mixed conventions but still decipherable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 28 tools the surface is on the heavy side and above the comfortable 3-15 range. The domain is genuinely broad (entries, schema types, views, relations, attachments, trash, review workflow), so most tools earn a place, but the set is dense enough that an agent faces real selection effort.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: full entry lifecycle (capture, read, update, trash, restore), relations, tags, status, attachments, schema introspection, saved views, and validation. The only notable gaps are no hard delete and no full-body replacement (both intentional per descriptions), which are acceptable constraints rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive