Skip to main content
Glama
patrickfreyer

Apple Mail MCP Server

by patrickfreyer
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Apple Mail MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Apple Mail MCP Server

      LeChabrax
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, and manage email on macOS through programmatic access to Apple Mail.
      29
      MIT

    • mcp-mail-server

      robotic-wings
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, and manage email via IMAP, and send emails with attachments via SMTP, using natural language commands.
      659 npm
      MIT

    • IMAP Email MCP Server

      jdickey1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, compose, and send emails by connecting to any IMAP/SMTP provider. It supports comprehensive mailbox management, including draft handling and message deletion, directly through natural language.
      10
      154 npm
      11
      MIT

    • MCP Email

      voiesdegypte
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, send, organize, and search emails across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes.
      1,383 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., search vs. thread vs. source, send vs. reply vs. forward), but several analytics/overview tools—get_inbox_overview, inbox_dashboard, get_statistics, get_top_senders—overlap in the 'summarize my inbox' space. The detailed descriptions help clarify differences, so ambiguity is limited to a few related tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are consistently snake_case with action-first verbs (list_, get_, create_, manage_, move_, update_), which is highly readable. Minor deviations exist, such as the noun-only inbox_dashboard and the less predictable get_awaiting_reply/get_needs_response phrasing.

    Tool Count2/5

    27 tools is above the typical 3–15 range and crosses the 'too many' threshold; several analytics/insight tools could be consolidated into fewer endpoints. However, each tool does map to a distinct operation, so the set is heavy rather than chaotic.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core email workflows well: listing accounts/mailboxes, searching/reading, sending/replying/forwarding, moving, flagging, trash, attachments, and sync. Gaps include no delete/rename mailbox operation and no explicit single-email rendered-body fetch, though raw source is available as a workaround.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources