Skip to main content
Glama
patrickdeanfox

Zuar Portal Blocks MCP Server

Create an HTML block

create_block

Create a new HTML block in the portal by providing its name, data query, CSS, tags, and access settings.

Instructions

Create a new HTML block. Accepts the full block payload (name, data, css, json_data, tags, access). Type is always html. Read the zportal://guide/* resources first to produce a correct two-field block.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesDisplay name of the block.
typeNoBlock type. This server only handles HTML blocks, so it must be "html".html
dataNoQuery config object, e.g. { "__source__": "<datasource-uuid>", "columns": ["*"], "limit": 500 }.
cssNoBlock CSS. Array form per the portal API; a raw CSS string is also accepted.
json_dataNoWidget/extra config object.
tagsNoTag names to attach.
accessNoAccess control, e.g. { "groups": ["group-name"] }.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate write, non-destructive, and non-idempotent behavior. The description adds that type is always html and accepts full payload, but does not detail side effects or success/failure states.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with front-loaded purpose and then a list of payload fields. The instruction about reading resources adds value but could be positioned more effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers parameters well via schema but lacks output details and behavioral context for a complex tool with 7 parameters and nested objects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description only lists parameter names without adding new meaning, so it does not enhance beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new HTML block' using a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from siblings like update_block and delete_block by implying this is the creation tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to read portal guide resources before use, providing a necessary prerequisite. It does not explicitly mention when not to use or alternatives, but the context of siblings implies this is the sole creation tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/patrickdeanfox/zuar-portal-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server