Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Pathmode

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first Agent OS that wraps Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other coding agents in a replayable Seed → Ledger → Runtime contract, driven by an interview → seed → execute → evaluate → evolve workflow loop.
      34
      18,092 PyPI
      6,193
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to clarify vague goals through Socratic questioning and generate structured technical specifications, using a curated knowledge base and session state without external LLM APIs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Standardize Context, Not Intelligence. An open protocol and native MCP server for preserving, organizing, and serving structured project context (architecture, decision logs, domain rules, and roadmap) to AI coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Antigravity) with built-in CLI verification
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents like Claude Code and Cursor to self-onboard a project by running spec-driven development setup from within the editor, inferring answers from the repo and prompting only for what remains. It initializes and manages a .specs/ directory over HTTP with no install or API key.
      1,242 npm
      38
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      One workspace for every AI coding assistant. Governance tools for API lint, diff, persistent ledger, multi-model deliberation, security audit, and test verification. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Gemini CLI.
      2
      213
      1,085 npm
      24
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., create_intent vs list_intents; get_intent_relations vs analyze_intent_graph). However, there is some overlap between export_context, intent_export, and intent_save, and between get_intent_relations and analyze_intent_graph, which could cause confusion for an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_intent, list_intents, update_intent). However, a few tools break this pattern (e.g., intent_export, intent_save, get_current_intent), introducing minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 20 tools, the set is on the heavy side of the typical range. While each tool serves a specific function, some could potentially be consolidated (e.g., intent_export vs export_context). The count is not excessive but warrants a slightly lower score.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers most lifecycle operations for intents and evidence (create, read, update, search, link, export). However, there are notable gaps: no tools to delete intents or evidence, and no tool to manage products beyond workspace retrieval.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues