Skip to main content
Glama
pascalhubacher

Jira Cloud MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jira Cloud MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Jira Cloud instances, including creating and updating issues, managing sprints and projects, adding comments, tracking worklogs, and searching with presets.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Atlassian Jira via API token authentication, with 46 optimized tools across modular architecture for CRUD, agile, dashboard, and search operations.
      37 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage Jira projects and issues using natural language, including creating, updating, searching issues, managing sprints, and more via the Jira API.
      36
      60 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 62 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource and action, but a few pairs blur together: get_issue_worklog/get_worklog, bulk_fetch_issues/search_and_reconsile_issues_using_jql_post, and get_all_projects/search_projects. The one-line descriptions are too terse to fully clarify these boundaries.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    There is a strong base of verb_noun names like get_issue, create_issue, update_comment, and delete_worklog, but conventions drift with submit_bulk_*, create_issues vs bulk_fetch_issues, do_transition, and the outlier search_and_reconsile_issues_using_jql_post. Overall the names remain readable but are not consistently patterned.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 62 tools, this far exceeds the 25+ 'too many' threshold and reaches the 50+ extreme-mismatch range. Even for a broad platform like Jira, the number of bulk, metadata, and subresource variants makes the surface overwhelming for an agent.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core issue lifecycle thoroughly: create/edit/get/delete, transitions, comments, worklogs, watchers, votes, attachments, issue links, properties, remote links, search, projects, and users. Minor gaps like attachment download/delete and update/delete for components/versions are workable and do not create dead ends in the main workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues