Jira Cloud MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Jira Cloud MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides Jira and Confluence integration for AI assistants, enabling natural language management of issues, projects, sprints, pages, comments, attachments, and more with 72 tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Jira Cloud by managing issues, comments, custom fields, and sprint tasks through a standardized interface. Supports issue creation, updates, team activity tracking, and progress reporting.1160 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Jira Cloud instances, including creating and updating issues, managing sprints and projects, adding comments, tracking worklogs, and searching with presets.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Atlassian Jira via API token authentication, with 46 optimized tools across modular architecture for CRUD, agile, dashboard, and search operations.37 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Jira Cloud projects with full CRUD operations, bulk actions, sprint and release management, and issue linking using natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Jira projects and issues using natural language, including creating, updating, searching issues, managing sprints, and more via the Jira API.3660 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 62 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource and action, but a few pairs blur together: get_issue_worklog/get_worklog, bulk_fetch_issues/search_and_reconsile_issues_using_jql_post, and get_all_projects/search_projects. The one-line descriptions are too terse to fully clarify these boundaries.
There is a strong base of verb_noun names like get_issue, create_issue, update_comment, and delete_worklog, but conventions drift with submit_bulk_*, create_issues vs bulk_fetch_issues, do_transition, and the outlier search_and_reconsile_issues_using_jql_post. Overall the names remain readable but are not consistently patterned.
With 62 tools, this far exceeds the 25+ 'too many' threshold and reaches the 50+ extreme-mismatch range. Even for a broad platform like Jira, the number of bulk, metadata, and subresource variants makes the surface overwhelming for an agent.
The server covers the core issue lifecycle thoroughly: create/edit/get/delete, transitions, comments, worklogs, watchers, votes, attachments, issue links, properties, remote links, search, projects, and users. Minor gaps like attachment download/delete and update/delete for components/versions are workable and do not create dead ends in the main workflow.