A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for TickTick API enabling task management, project organization, habit tracking, and more.
74 npm
73
MIT
ticktick-mcp
by partymola
Related Servers
Alternatives to ticktick-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRemote MCP server for managing TickTick tasks and projects, offering 22 tools for CRUD, search, and GTD workflows via any MCP client.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA security-hardened MCP server for TickTick that enables managing your tasks directly through any MCP-compatible client.15 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for TickTick task management. Enables AI assistants to create, update, list, search, and complete tasks via natural language.12 npm29MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAgent-friendly CLI and MCP server for TickTick and Dida365 task management APIs, enabling project and task management with stable JSON output and OAuth authentication.171MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for integrating TickTick task management with AI applications, enabling task and project operations via natural language.4 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.6/5.0
Scored across 14 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly separated roles (create/update/delete/complete/move/subtask/sync), and the paired completion-queue tools are well delineated. Minor overlap exists: ticktick_get_tasks_from_project duplicates a subset of ticktick_filter_tasks, and ticktick_get_all has a broken "tasks" branch that further muddies listing options. The detailed descriptions prevent most misselections.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools share the ticktick_ prefix and follow a verb-first snake_case convention such as filter_tasks, create_task, update_task, delete_tasks, and mark_completion_processed. Even utility tools like get_by_id, get_all, and sync fit the predictable pattern. No mixed casing or inconsistent verb styles.
Tool Count4/5
14 tools sits at the upper edge of well-scoped for a task management server, and most earn their place. A few feel redundant or optional: get_tasks_from_project largely overlaps filter_tasks, convert_datetime_to_ticktick_format is only a convenience since create/update accept ISO strings directly, and get_all has an inert tasks branch.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the core task lifecycle well: create, read/filter, update, delete, complete, move, subtasks, a completion-review queue, and forced sync. Notable gaps include no project management beyond listing, no explicit text/keyword search, and a broken get_all("tasks") branch that requires a workaround.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues