Skip to main content
Glama
google-health-mcp

google-health-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to google-health-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A remote MCP server that gives MCP clients read-only, OAuth-authenticated access to Google Health API data such as activity, sleep, heart, body, nutrition and ECG records. It exposes tools for profiles, paired devices, data points, daily summaries and time-window rollups, and is deployed on Cloudflare Workers.
      55 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to read daily activity, sleep, heart rate, and body metrics from Google Health API, allowing AI assistants like Claude to access your health data. Optionally syncs health metrics to an Obsidian vault.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that enables AI agents to read user-authorized Google Health API v4 data from Fitbit, Pixel Watch, and partners via OAuth, with tokens never leaving the machine.
      26
      850 npm
      81
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that aggregates personal health data from Google Health, Oura, and Withings into a single, provider-attributed interface with configurable source of truth preferences.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Self-hosted multi-user Google Health OAuth broker and read-only Agent API with remote MCP support. Enables users to connect their Google account and grant agents secure access to activity, sleep, heart, HRV, SpO2, and other health metrics via revocable per-token authentication.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    There are several deliberate near-pairs (health_get_sleep vs health_get_sleep_sessions, health_get_weight vs health_get_weight_readings, health_get_skin_temperature vs health_get_core_temperature, health_trends vs the raw health_get_* tools), but each description explicitly states how it differs from its sibling and points to the right alternative. An agent can pick correctly without guessing, though it must read the descriptions carefully rather than infer from names alone.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly everything follows the health_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern (health_get_heart_rate, health_sync), and related tools form clear families. The only deviation is health_trends, which omits a verb, making its action ('analyse') less predictable than the rest.

    Tool Count4/5

    24 tools is on the heavy side, but the Google Health surface genuinely spans ~15 distinct metric types plus sync, aggregation, profile and device state, and each tool maps to one resource. The granularity variants (sleep sessions, weigh-ins, routes, lifetime stats) each add real capability rather than duplicating.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full read lifecycle: cache sync/backfill, raw per-type reads for every metric the API exposes, aggregates (health_trends), lifetime totals, profile/settings, devices, ECG waveforms and exercise GPS routes. It is read-only, but that reflects the underlying API rather than a gap in the surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data