google-health-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to google-health-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA remote MCP server that gives MCP clients read-only, OAuth-authenticated access to Google Health API data such as activity, sleep, heart, body, nutrition and ECG records. It exposes tools for profiles, paired devices, data points, daily summaries and time-window rollups, and is deployed on Cloudflare Workers.55 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to read daily activity, sleep, heart rate, and body metrics from Google Health API, allowing AI assistants like Claude to access your health data. Optionally syncs health metrics to an Obsidian vault.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that enables AI agents to read user-authorized Google Health API v4 data from Fitbit, Pixel Watch, and partners via OAuth, with tokens never leaving the machine.26850 npm81MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server that aggregates personal health data from Google Health, Oura, and Withings into a single, provider-attributed interface with configurable source of truth preferences.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceSelf-hosted multi-user Google Health OAuth broker and read-only Agent API with remote MCP support. Enables users to connect their Google account and grant agents secure access to activity, sleep, heart, HRV, SpO2, and other health metrics via revocable per-token authentication.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that locally authenticates with Google Health API v4 and provides read-only access to Fitbit, Pixel Watch, and other health data for AI agents.29119 npm19MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
There are several deliberate near-pairs (health_get_sleep vs health_get_sleep_sessions, health_get_weight vs health_get_weight_readings, health_get_skin_temperature vs health_get_core_temperature, health_trends vs the raw health_get_* tools), but each description explicitly states how it differs from its sibling and points to the right alternative. An agent can pick correctly without guessing, though it must read the descriptions carefully rather than infer from names alone.
Nearly everything follows the health_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern (health_get_heart_rate, health_sync), and related tools form clear families. The only deviation is health_trends, which omits a verb, making its action ('analyse') less predictable than the rest.
24 tools is on the heavy side, but the Google Health surface genuinely spans ~15 distinct metric types plus sync, aggregation, profile and device state, and each tool maps to one resource. The granularity variants (sleep sessions, weigh-ins, routes, lifetime stats) each add real capability rather than duplicating.
The set covers the full read lifecycle: cache sync/backfill, raw per-type reads for every metric the API exposes, aggregates (health_trends), lifetime totals, profile/settings, devices, ECG waveforms and exercise GPS routes. It is read-only, but that reflects the underlying API rather than a gap in the surface.