bosch_get_bike

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that it returns a cached raw API response and that component info may be included, providing some behavioral insight. It does not mention potential side effects, permissions, or rate limits, which would be expected for a read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, with the primary purpose stated first. The Args section is clearly separated, and every sentence adds value without verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains return values sufficiently for a single-bike retrieval tool, mentioning full details and cached raw API response. Given that an output schema exists, it does not need to enumerate all fields. The sibling context and lack of complex parameters make the description adequately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only shows a string bike_id, but the description adds crucial context by explaining it is a bike UUID from bosch_get_bikes. This goes beyond the schema and helps the agent select the correct value. However, it could provide more detail on formatting or how to obtain the UUID.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a detailed profile for a single Bosch eBike, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tool bosch_get_bikes by explicitly targeting a single bike.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by specifying the bike_id should come from bosch_get_bikes, indicating this tool is for retrieving details after listing. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.