Skip to main content
Glama
parsiya

Trailmark MCP Server

by parsiya

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
open_repositoryC

Open a repository, loading latest snapshot or scanning source as needed.

current_repositoryC

Return metadata for the active repository session.

close_repositoryB

Close an active repository session.

graph_summaryC

Return graph counts and dependency summary.

diff_graphsC

Return a structured diff of the after graph relative to the before graph.

search_nodesC

Search graph nodes using contains, exact, or suffix matching.

callers_ofC

Return direct callers of a node.

callees_ofC

Return direct callees of a node.

ancestors_ofC

Return transitive callers that can reach the node.

reachable_fromC

Return nodes transitively reachable from the source node.

paths_betweenC

Return call paths between two nodes.

entrypoint_paths_toC

Return paths from detected entrypoints to the target node.

attack_surfaceC

Return detected entrypoints and trust metadata.

complexity_hotspotsC

Return nodes whose cyclomatic complexity meets the threshold.

subgraphC

Return available subgraph names or the nodes in a named subgraph.

annotations_ofB

Return annotations for a node, optionally filtered by kind.

findingsC

Return nodes carrying finding-style annotations.

nodes_with_annotationC

Return nodes carrying a specific annotation kind.

functions_that_raiseC

Return functions whose parser-detected exception list includes the named exception.

run_preanalysisD

Run Trailmark preanalysis on the active engine.

annotate_nodeC

Attach an annotation to a graph node.

clear_annotationsC

Remove annotations from a node.

augment_findingsB

Import findings into the current graph from SARIF or weAudit.

save_snapshotC

Persist the current graph state under .trailmark/snapshots.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 24 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: graph traversal (ancestors_of, callees_of, callers_of, reachable_from), annotation management (annotate_node, annotations_of, clear_annotations, nodes_with_annotation), repository lifecycle (open_repository, close_repository, current_repository, save_snapshot), and analysis (attack_surface, complexity_hotspots, findings, etc.). No two tools have overlapping purposes.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names follow two predictable patterns: query-like operations use noun_of (e.g., ancestors_of, callees_of, callers_of) and action operations use verb_noun (e.g., annotate_node, open_repository, save_snapshot). This pattern is consistent throughout the set, with no mixing of casing styles or ambiguous verbs.

Tool Count4/5

With 24 tools, the count is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) but still appropriate for a comprehensive code analysis server covering graph traversal, annotations, repository management, and analysis features. The tools are logically grouped and each serves a distinct purpose, so the number does not feel excessive.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers core workflows: opening/closing repositories, scanning, traversing the call graph, managing annotations, and querying findings. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to list all repositories (only current_repository) or to delete nodes/annotations, but these do not critically hinder typical use cases for a static analysis tool.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues