Scored across 16 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct domains and actions, and descriptions explicitly clarify overlaps such as token_diagnostic bundling token_risk and contract_health_audit, or funding_apr_matrix building on funding_rate. A few arbitrage/risk tools remain close enough that an agent must read the caveats carefully to choose correctly.
Most tools use a domain-prefixed snake_case namespace (security., prediction., derivatives., dex., arb., market., calendar.), but convert_to_markdown and get_token_dump_risk are unprefixed outliers. The names are readable, but the mixed convention and noun-phrase style make the pattern only partly predictable.
The server has 16 tools spanning many subdomains: security, derivatives, prediction markets, DEX/arbitrage, macro calendar, and markdown conversion. That is borderline heavy for one MCP server, and security.token_diagnostic duplicates two other tools, adding some redundancy.
The surface covers a broad crypto-intelligence lifecycle: token risk, LP health, unlock risk, funding rates, whale positions, slippage, arbitrage, prediction markets, and macro events. Minor gaps remain around general price/OHLCV data, news/sentiment, wallet discovery, and portfolio tracking, but core workflows are workable.
