kaggle-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to kaggle-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA full-featured MCP server with 96 tools for the Kaggle API, enabling users to manage competitions, datasets, notebooks, models, discussions, and workflows via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude AI to the Kaggle API through the Model Context Protocol, enabling users to browse competitions, search and download datasets, analyze kernels, and access pre-trained models through natural language interactions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides seamless integration with the Kaggle API, enabling interaction with competitions, datasets, kernels, and models through MCP-compatible clients.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude AI to the Kaggle API through the Model Context Protocol, enabling competition, dataset, and kernel operations through the AI interface.35MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that connects Claude Code to your work environment through auditable tools for file operations, API calls, and command execution, with safety gates and configuration.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA full-featured MCP server for the Kaggle API — competitions, datasets, kernels, models, benchmarks, and discussions.513MIT
TDQS
Scored across 41 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action, with detailed descriptions that clearly differentiate them. For example, kaggle_get_competition, kaggle_competition_landscape, and kaggle_competition_leaderboard serve different purposes (details, triage, leaderboard). There is no ambiguity.
All tools share the kaggle_ prefix and use underscore-separated names. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., kaggle_get_competition, kaggle_list_datasets), but some are noun-first (e.g., kaggle_competition_landscape, kaggle_competition_leaderboard). This minor inconsistency does not hinder readability.
With 41 tools, the server covers a broad Kaggle domain (competitions, datasets, kernels, discussions, models). While each tool has a clear purpose, the count is at the high end considering the scope. A more streamlined set could reduce cognitive load.
The tool surface is remarkably complete for Kaggle workflows, covering competition lifecycle (list, get, download, EDA, submit, track), dataset management (search, create, version, delete), kernels (push/pull/status/output), discussions (search/get), models (list/download/delete), and admin (auth, audit, status). Obvious gaps like discussion posting are due to API limitations.