Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Pro Se USPTO MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to search MPEP/USC/CFR patent rules, run prior-art searches across 100M+ patents via BigQuery, check 35 USC 112 compliance, and generate patent-style diagrams and draft application workflows.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to search patent rules and 100M+ patents, run automated 35 USC 112 compliance and prior-art checks, draft and review patent applications, and generate patent-style diagrams via programmatic tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables patent-rule lookup with citations over MPEP/USC/CFR via hybrid vector, lexical, and reranked search, plus prior-art searching across 100M+ patents through Google BigQuery. Also runs automated 35 USC 112 compliance checks on draft claims and applications and generates patent-style diagrams and flowcharts.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes tools that let any MCP-compatible client search MPEP/USC/CFR patent regulations via hybrid RAG, run prior art searches over 100M+ patents through Google BigQuery, perform automated 35 USC 112 compliance checks on draft claims and applications, and generate patent-style diagrams. It also supports an end-to-end guided workflow from invention description to a reviewable draft patent application.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to search MPEP/USC/CFR patent rules, perform prior-art searches across 100M+ patents via BigQuery, run 35 USC 112 compliance checks, and generate patent-style diagrams through programmatic tools.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct patent procedure: form lookup, entity status, fee calculation, provisional deadlines, response deadlines, and IDS requirements. No two tools overlap in purpose, so an agent can unambiguously select the right one.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (find_, check_, calculate_, track_, calculate_, check_). This predictable structure makes the toolkit easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of assisting pro se inventors. Each tool addresses a common procedural pain point without redundancy or unnecessary bulk.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the most critical pro se needs: form identification, entity status, fees, provisional deadlines, office action responses, and IDS. Minor gaps exist (e.g., nonprovisional filing guidance, appeals), but these are not critical for the core use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues