A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceEnables searching and retrieving Austrian federal legislation and case law from the official legal information system RIS, with verifiable ELI and ECLI identifiers.
6
Apache 2.0
at-ris-mcp
by paragraflabs
Related Servers
Alternatives to at-ris-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve Austrian federal legislation, provisions, case law, and EU implementation data with verbatim source citations and currency validation.49 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and reading Austria's consolidated federal law by provision as of any date, and searching and reading decisions of the constitutional, administrative and ordinary courts by case number or ECLI. Text is returned in the original German, paged in full, with in-force dates kept separate from publication dates.457 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSearch Austrian consolidated federal & state law, court decisions, and the authentic Bundesgesetzblatt from the official RIS via MCP, keyless and supporting STDIO or Streamable HTTP.1,201 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives you access to Austria's official legal database, the Rechtsinformationssystem (RIS).13325 npm20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Austrian federal law (Bundesrecht) to LLMs, enabling full-text search, paragraph retrieval, historical versions, statute lookup, BGBl lookups, amendment timelines, and citation searches via the public RIS OGD API.MIT
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one for searching Austrian federal law, the other for fetching the full text of a specific statute or section. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow a consistent 'ris_verb_noun' pattern: ris_search_law and ris_get_law_text. The naming is predictable and clear.
Tool Count3/5
With only two tools, the server is minimal. While they cover search and retrieval, the scope suggests more tools might be expected (e.g., browsing, categorizing), making it borderline but not inadequate.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the essential workflow of searching for a law and retrieving its full text. Minor gaps exist, such as direct access to law lists or metadata, but the core functionality is complete.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive