No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 3 tools
list_ai_crawlers (reference data), check_robots (offline robots.txt evaluation) and check_site (network-based full GEO audit) each have a clearly stated purpose. The only mild overlap is that check_site also covers robots.txt AI-crawler access, so an agent could conceivably pick check_site when it only wanted the robots check, but the offline/online distinction in the descriptions resolves this.
All three names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_ai_crawlers, check_robots, check_site. The check_ prefix groups the two evaluation tools logically and list_ signals the reference-data tool.
Three tools is on the small side, but the server's scope (GEO/technical crawlability checks) is narrow and each tool earns its place: one reference list, one offline evaluator, one full site audit. Slightly thin but well scoped rather than padded.
The surface covers the core GEO workflow: discovering which crawlers matter, testing robots.txt offline, and running a combined audit of robots.txt, JSON-LD, /llms.txt, sitemap and head tags. Minor gaps exist — no standalone llms.txt or JSON-LD/sitemap check, and no offline HTML inspection — but these are reachable through check_site.
