Skip to main content
Glama
panuhen

web-mcp

by panuhen
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to web-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • searxng-crawl4ai-mcp

      siosig
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web searches and page fetching/crawling through self-hosted SearXNG and Crawl4AI, without depending on commercial search or scraping APIs.
      -

    • web-search-server

      sanqiuyef
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run local multi-engine web searches, fetch pages through anti-bot fallback chains, and query site-specific sources such as GitHub, npm, PyPI, Docker Hub, and Twitter/X for structured results.
      MIT

    • Crawl4AI+SearXNG MCP Server

      AI-enthusiasts
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with a comprehensive web intelligence stack including crawling, private search via SearXNG, and intelligent RAG capabilities for focused content extraction. It supports advanced features like semantic vector search and knowledge graph integration for code validation to enhance AI performance and reliability.
      MIT

    • WebFetch.MCP

      manooll
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local LLMs to search the web and fetch clean content from URLs without API keys, using SearxNG and Mozilla Readability.
      2
      39
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    web_search and read_page target clearly different actions (discovery vs. full-content retrieval) with no overlap in purpose. An agent can unambiguously pick the right tool based on whether it needs to find URLs or extract content from a known URL.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use snake_case and concise English, but the conventions differ slightly: 'web_search' is a noun-prefixed verb while 'read_page' is a verb-noun pair. It is still readable and predictable enough that the minor deviation doesn't hinder selection.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a general-purpose web access server; search plus read is the minimal viable pair. It is defensible for the stated scope but leaves no room for adjacent operations, making it borderline under-scoped rather than well-provisioned.

    Completeness4/5

    The search-then-read lifecycle is fully covered, and the read tool handles HTML, PDF, text, JSON, retries, and truncation, which is thorough. Minor gaps exist (no multi-URL batch read or explicit raw/headers fetch), but agents can work around them via sequential calls.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources