Skip to main content
Glama
Panda Web Security Tools

Panda Web Security Tools

Related Servers

Alternatives to Panda Web Security Tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Email-deliverability tools for AI agents — 12 MCP tools across email verification, DNSBL across 50 zones, SPF/DKIM/DMARC analysis, spam-trap scoring, domain intelligence, and email finder. Free tier with no credit card.
      12
      39 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides live infrastructure monitoring for AI agents, including domain health checks, MCP server security posture, email blacklists, broken-link scans, and cloud vendor status. No signup or API key needed for public tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and LLMs to scrape web pages into clean Markdown, audit email deliverability and authentication records, and verify email signup fraud risk through MCP tools.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform live Google SERP searches, run on-page and full-site SEO audits with prioritized fixes, and check brand visibility in AI answer engines via four MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for IntoDNS.ai providing 36 free tools for DNS, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI, DNSSEC, MTA-STS, FCrDNS, blacklist and email security checks. Citation-grade report snapshots with content hashes. No API key required.
      45
      300 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The four tools target clearly separate resources and actions: DNS email authentication, hidden page content/prompt injection, on-page SEO/AI readiness, and stateful page diffs. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other and state when not to use a tool, leaving little overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names use snake_case and a descriptive noun-phrase pattern ending in checker/scanner/audit/monitor. The convention is predictable across the set, even though it is not verb_noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well within the appropriate range for a focused audit toolkit, and each tool covers a distinct workflow rather than padding the surface. The set is compact but not trivially thin.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is solid for the included workflows (email security, hidden-instruction scanning, SEO/AI readiness, change tracking), but a server branded as web security tools lacks common checks such as HTTP security headers, TLS/certificate issues, exposed files, or broader vulnerability scanning. These are notable gaps rather than fatal omissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues