Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
pandadad0214

Panda Federation Tools

by pandadad0214
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Panda Federation Tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • actors-mcp

      fecklesspleb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes 14 fecklesspleb Apify Actors (job boards, Hacker News, SEO audit, metadata, web tools) as tools; runs bill per result to the caller's own Apify account.
      10
      MIT

    • US Government Data

      CBLU2005
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Search official US government data from any MCP client: building permits from 10 city open-data portals, federal contract opportunities from SAM.gov with contracting-officer contacts, and the CMS NPI healthcare-provider registry. Open-source TypeScript server; data delivered via Apify's pay-per-result actors using your own Apify token.
      3
      MIT

    • Lookout

      SylphxAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling local-first web search, fetch, extract, and caching with citeable excerpts, no API key required. Supports research workflows for agents and apps.
      65 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Scholar MCP Server

      mlintangmz2765
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.
      27
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct targets: reference checking, citation formatting, literature search, PubMed evidence tables, grant finding, PDF extraction, and various lead/enrichment sources. A few pairs could be confused at first glance (literature_search vs pubmed_evidence_table; company_team_finder vs company_website_enricher), but their descriptions make the boundaries clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 18 tools use consistent snake_case noun-phrase naming, with no camelCase or stylistic mixing. Suffixes like _finder, _checker, _enricher, and _tracker form a predictable and readable convention across the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    Eighteen tools is on the heavy side for a single server, especially because the set spans unrelated domains such as academic research, federal contracting, local lead generation, SEO, and email security. Each tool is individually justified, but the overall count feels closer to a marketplace bundle than a tightly scoped toolkit.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is broad but shallow across multiple domains: academic research has search, checking, formatting, and PubMed extraction, yet lacks full-text retrieval or citation-network tools; lead generation has many finders and enrichers but no verification, CRM, or update/delete operations. Agents can work around these gaps, but the surface is not complete for any one workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources