Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to abap-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Offline MCP server for SAP ABAP static analysis, ABAP Cloud readiness scoring, and RAP scaffolding. It enables AI agents to lint ABAP source, compare reworks, check released APIs, and generate RAP business objects without needing an SAP system.
      9
      257 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that connects to SAP ABAP systems via ADT HTTP API, enabling AI assistants to search, read, and manage ABAP objects securely without SAP GUI.
      5
      407 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server for SAP ABAP development and customizing that connects directly to your SAP system via ADT REST API, enabling AI assistants to search, read, write, activate, transport, debug, and run quality checks on ABAP code, as well as manage customizing/IMG configurations with governed transport recording.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with SAP systems via the ABAP Development Tools (ADT) REST API. It allows users to read ABAP source code, inspect DDIC objects, and execute SQL queries directly.
      66
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for SAP ABAP development that enables AI assistants and code editors to interact with SAP systems via ABAP Developer Toolkit (ADT) APIs, supporting read, create, update, and delete of ABAP objects.
      100
      750 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct roles (lint, fix, format, outline, scaffold, catalog) and descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other to draw boundaries. The main overlap is the trio check_cloud_readiness / plan_cloud_migration / compare_abap, which all share the same dual-parse analysis, and lint_abap which silently runs the RAP checker that check_rap_behavior also exposes — noticeable but well-explained, so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every name is snake_case with a verb-first pattern (check_, lint_, fix_, format_, scaffold_, get_, list_, explain_, compare_, plan_, search_). The noun portions are consistent and descriptive, with no camelCase or mixed-style deviations across all 18 tools.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools sits at the upper end of comfortable, but the domain (ABAP linting, cloud readiness, migration planning, scaffolding, knowledge lookup) genuinely needs this many distinct capabilities, and each tool maps to a real workflow step. Nothing looks like redundant filler, though a few could plausibly be consolidated (e.g. the readiness/plan/compare family).

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full offline lifecycle: analyze (lint, outline, dependencies, RAP check), remediate (fix, format), assess cloud readiness, plan, compare, scaffold (RAP BO, unit tests, AI SDK), and consult knowledge/rules/releases. Gaps are intentional and documented (no live ATC, no system connection, no service binding), leaving only minor workarounds for agents.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues