Remove a category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description discloses the key edge case: it fails on the last category unless force=true. It does not, however, state whether removing a category also removes its items or what the return value is, leaving some behavioral ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the main action, and contains no filler. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a simple interface, but the description omits potential side effects (e.g., items in the category) and return behavior. It covers the main action and a critical failure mode, but not enough to be fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description gives semantic context for force ('unless force is true') but does not explicitly explain listId or categoryId. Since the schema has no descriptions and coverage is 0%, the description only partially compensates, though the parameter names are fairly self-explanatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Removes') and a resource ('a category from a list'), making the tool's function clear. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like rename_category or add_category by focusing on deletion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It implies the tool is for removing categories and provides a condition about the last category, which helps the agent understand when it may fail. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.