Skip to main content
Glama
pageguard

pageguard-mcp

Official
by pageguard
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to pageguard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Sekrd Security Scanner by sekrdcom

      Sekrd Security Scannerofficial

      sekrdcom
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables deep security auditing of web applications directly from AI IDEs including Cursor and Claude Code. Scans URLs for vulnerabilities, returns security scores with SHIP/BLOCK verdicts, and provides specific fix prompts for remediation.
      3
      -

    • Compileq

      PsylinksSecurityWeb
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted compliance scanning of codebases for GDPR, CCPA, WCAG, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, EU AI Act, and other regulations, providing risk scores, fine estimates, and suggested fixes within MCP-compatible IDEs.
      -

    • aigently

      aelbuni
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Securely feeds summarized expert security rules into your coding assistance Claude Code, Cursor, etc — zero config, no API key.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools serve distinctly different purposes: scan_local analyzes codebase dependencies, scan_url analyzes live websites, and generate_docs produces legal documents from scan results. No functional overlap exists between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent pageguard_verb_noun snake_case pattern. The scanning tools use parallel naming (scan_local, scan_url) to distinguish targets, while generate_docs clearly indicates its document creation purpose.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is appropriate for this focused domain, covering the essential scan-local, scan-production, and generate-documentation workflow. While functional, the surface is minimal and could benefit from supporting tools like get_scan or list_documents.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is covered: dual scanning capabilities and document generation. Minor gaps exist in document lifecycle management (no retrieval of previous scans or generated documents), but agents can work with immediate return values.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources