YaCy Fork Peer-to-Peer Search
Related Servers
Alternatives to YaCy Fork Peer-to-Peer Search
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables keyless web search across multiple engines with fallback and relevance ranking, plus anonymous HTTP(S) page fetching, all without API keys or vendor dependencies.21-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceFully decentralized P2P web search engine for LLMs. Crawls, indexes, and searches the web via a peer-to-peer network — no API key, no billing. Exposes 5 MCP tools: web_search, fetch_page, crawl_url, fact_check, and status.72 PyPI7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables keyless local web search and page fetching through MCP, with domain-filtered queries, extractable original-text evidence, hashes, and snapshot cursors for verifiable, traceable results.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGives AI agents local web search and page reading with no API keys, layering a SearXNG-backed search cache with browser-based fallbacks and returning clean page text from HTML, PDF, JSON, and archived snapshots. Fetches run in Docker alongside the search engine with SSRF protection, egress filtering, and untrusted-content marking so agents can safely retrieve live web data.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables private web search and webpage content extraction using a local SearxNG instance, prioritizing user privacy and autonomy.22MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA provider-neutral Web Search MCP server and CLI that combines live search, scholarly discovery, verified PDF downloads, URL normalization, multi-provider ranking, secure page fetching, caching, and citation-ready research evidence.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action: search_web for querying, crawl_site/list_crawls/control_crawl for crawl lifecycle, get_index_status/list_peers for peer and index state, get/set_ranking_setting/evaluate_ranking for ranking, delete_document for index removal, and get_trust_status for trust. The only mild overlap between get_index_status and list_peers is resolved by descriptions (own peer vs other peers).
All names use snake_case and a verb_noun pattern (get_ranking_settings, search_web, crawl_site, etc.). Minor inconsistency: get_ranking_settings uses plural 'settings' while set_ranking_setting uses singular 'setting'.
11 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool has a clear, non-redundant role in the P2P search peer management workflow.
The surface covers the core lifecycle: search, crawl management, index deletion, peer status, ranking read/write/evaluate, and trust inspection. Gaps include no way to write trust statements (only read), no direct listing of indexed documents (only via search), and no peer connection management.