Skip to main content
Glama
pablixnieto2

ETL-D MCP Server

by pablixnieto2

Related Servers

Alternatives to ETL-D MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Parse and query bank statements — turn PDF statements into structured transactions, accounts, and balances, with balance-reconciliation checks. A deterministic financial memory for AI agents, served as a hosted streamable-HTTP endpoint (API key or OAuth).
      16
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      The deterministic fact-verification layer for AI agents. Validates the structured facts an agent emits — IBANs, payment cards, VAT and national tax IDs, crypto and bank addresses, domains, emails, phone numbers, securities and academic identifiers, plus dates, currencies and holidays — against checksums and curated authoritative data, not guesses.
      56
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with deterministic, offline finance tools for commodity margin analysis, loan covenant compliance, invoice auditing, AP exception classification, and five-day close readiness.
      14
      17 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Converts PDF bank statements into structured data (Markdown, JSON, CSV, JSONL) with verified transactions and balance checks, enabling agents to audit numbers.
      5
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform identity verification, KYC/KYB, PEP & sanctions screening, bank statement analysis, and workflow automation via the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic tools for transforming, formatting, and inspecting structured data for AI agents.
      6 npm
      19
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes. For example, enrich_single can do what specific enrich_* tools do, match_endpoint and dedupe_items both perform fuzzy matching, generate_sepa and download_sepa are near-identical, and pipeline tools duplicate individual enrich operations. This ambiguity increases the risk of agents selecting the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names follow a standard suffix pattern (_v1_..._post), but prefixes vary inconsistently: some use 'enrich_', others 'parse_', 'extract_', 'generate_', 'download_', and a few have 'endpoint' or 'system' inserted. While the overall structure is recognizable, the inconsistency in action verbs and qualifiers makes it less predictable than it could be.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the count is too high for the server's scope. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., all enrich_* into one parameterized tool, SEPA generation and download into one). This adds unnecessary complexity and cognitive load, making the toolset feel bloated rather than well-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers many data enrichment and parsing tasks, but several practical gaps remain. Notably, create_batch_task returns a task_id with no polling/status tool to retrieve results, and there is no generic CSV parser or credit balance checker. These missing operations will hinder agent workflows that require batch processing or account monitoring.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues