Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to askjev

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify claims against cited evidence, screen content for prompt injection and relevance before reading it, and rank candidates by meaning, all with calibrated probability verdicts.
      3
      45
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables typed, calibrated judgment calls through classify, score, check, and batched ask tools, each returning full probability distributions for programmatic decisions.
      5
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents and CI with a typed decision layer that sends bounded state and questions to Jev, then returns deterministic actions for review, risk assessment, requirement checks, and verification.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to make calibrated decisions via six MCP tools for classification, relevance ranking, claim verification, action gating, next-step control, and model listing, using Jev's System One model without generating text.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of an agent confusing it with any other. The ask tool has a clearly described purpose and modes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, there are no naming inconsistencies to evaluate. 'ask' is a simple, clear verb that matches the server's purpose.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is on the thin end of the spectrum, explicitly in the borderline 1-2 range. However, the server's scope is narrow enough that this single tool is functionally sufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    The ask tool covers yes/no, choice, and scale questions with built-in rubrics and returns confidence and routing, covering the full intended domain. No obvious missing operations for a judgment-query server.