Skip to main content
Glama
p2k3m

MCP Vertica

by p2k3m

execute_query

Run SQL queries on Vertica databases to retrieve and analyze data, supporting connection pooling and secure SSL/TLS connections for database operations.

Instructions

Execute a SQL query and return the results.

Args:
    ctx: FastMCP context for progress reporting and logging
    query: SQL query to execute
    database: Optional database name to execute the query against

Returns:
    Query results as a string

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action and return type, omitting crucial details such as whether the query is read-only, impacts on data, or required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably concise with a clear structure (Args, Returns). The purpose sentence is front-loaded, and every sentence serves a purpose despite the parameter mismatch.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It lacks details about error handling, supported SQL syntax, database selection, and whether the tool is safe for read-only queries.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning for the 'query' parameter ('SQL query to execute'), but it also mentions 'ctx' and 'database' which are not in the input schema, causing confusion. Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate but instead introduces inconsistency.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Execute a SQL query and return the results,' which is a specific verb and resource. However, the mention of parameters not present in the input schema (ctx, database) slightly reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like stream_query or copy_data. The description does not specify prerequisites or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.