solana-nft-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to solana-nft-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides read-only access to Solana on-chain data, enabling natural language queries for wallet balances, token holdings, prices, transactions, and more via MCP-compatible clients.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA read-only Solana MCP server that lets AI assistants query SOL prices, wallet balances, SPL token holdings, and recent transactions on the Solana mainnet via natural language over stdio.411 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSolana DeFi Intelligence MCP server enabling natural language queries for wallet analytics, DeFi positions, protocol metrics, and token prices.81MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Hermes Agent to the Solana blockchain, enabling natural language queries for wallets, tokens, NFTs, transactions, whale movements, and network health.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Hyperliquid that provides read-only on-chain wallet analytics. Enables natural-language queries about positions, fills, funding, and realized PnL for any public address.84 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only token intelligence for Robinhood Chain and Solana, providing safety checks, ticker resolution, deployer records, whale wallet tracking, and outcome measurements via a hosted MCP server.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
The descriptions go to unusual lengths to separate tools, explicitly stating when to use one vs another (e.g. get_floor_prices vs get_collection_stats, get_top_traders vs get_collection_sales vs get_collection_holders, get_wallet_holdings/profile/activity). Still, a few pairs genuinely overlap: get_recent_sales vs get_collection_sales both return collection sales, and the three wallet tools share a subject, so an agent could misselect without rereading the fine print.
Names are uniformly lowercase snake_case and heavily dominated by a verb_noun pattern (get_collection_stats, get_wallet_activity, find_listings). Minor deviations exist: several verbs are synonyms for retrieval (get vs search_collections vs find_in_group), and identify/verify_claim/explain_mechanics drop the noun, but the set remains predictable.
At 21 tools the surface is on the heavy side, but the domain genuinely spans collections, wallets, assets, sales, listings, provenance, trust and reference content, and each tool maps to a distinct query type. Nothing looks like filler, though a couple of retrieval tools could conceivably be merged.
For a deliberately read-only market/intelligence server the coverage is thorough: identification, discovery, floors/stats, listings, sales, holders, per-wallet and per-asset views, on-chain provenance and trust decoding, plus meta-tools (source status, mechanics, integration recipes, claim verification). No obvious lifecycle gap given the stated read-only purpose.