Skip to main content
Glama
p1xelapp

solana-nft-mcp

by p1xelapp

Related Servers

Alternatives to solana-nft-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to Solana on-chain data, enabling natural language queries for wallet balances, token holdings, prices, transactions, and more via MCP-compatible clients.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Solana DeFi Intelligence MCP server enabling natural language queries for wallet analytics, DeFi positions, protocol metrics, and token prices.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Hyperliquid that provides read-only on-chain wallet analytics. Enables natural-language queries about positions, fills, funding, and realized PnL for any public address.
      8
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only token intelligence for Robinhood Chain and Solana, providing safety checks, ticker resolution, deployer records, whale wallet tracking, and outcome measurements via a hosted MCP server.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The descriptions go to unusual lengths to separate tools, explicitly stating when to use one vs another (e.g. get_floor_prices vs get_collection_stats, get_top_traders vs get_collection_sales vs get_collection_holders, get_wallet_holdings/profile/activity). Still, a few pairs genuinely overlap: get_recent_sales vs get_collection_sales both return collection sales, and the three wallet tools share a subject, so an agent could misselect without rereading the fine print.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are uniformly lowercase snake_case and heavily dominated by a verb_noun pattern (get_collection_stats, get_wallet_activity, find_listings). Minor deviations exist: several verbs are synonyms for retrieval (get vs search_collections vs find_in_group), and identify/verify_claim/explain_mechanics drop the noun, but the set remains predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 21 tools the surface is on the heavy side, but the domain genuinely spans collections, wallets, assets, sales, listings, provenance, trust and reference content, and each tool maps to a distinct query type. Nothing looks like filler, though a couple of retrieval tools could conceivably be merged.

    Completeness5/5

    For a deliberately read-only market/intelligence server the coverage is thorough: identification, discovery, floors/stats, listings, sales, holders, per-wallet and per-asset views, on-chain provenance and trust decoding, plus meta-tools (source status, mechanics, integration recipes, claim verification). No obvious lifecycle gap given the stated read-only purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive