search_arxiv_materiaux

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that the tool searches preprints not yet peer-reviewed, which is a key behavioral trait. No annotations exist, so description carries the burden; it could mention authorization or rate limits but overall adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that front-load the tool's purpose. Could be slightly more structured, but every sentence contributes meaningfully without repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description could elaborate on return format, but the core function is clear. Context of usage and alternative tools are provided, making it fairly complete for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so baseline 3. The description adds an example for 'materiau' ('titanium', 'nickel alloy') beyond the schema description, helping interpretation. maxResults is documented in schema but not elaborated in description, yet still adds value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies a concrete action (search for recent preprints on ArXiv) and a distinct domain (materials and alloys), differentiating it from sibling tools like search_openalex_materiaux. It uses a specific verb and resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (exploring emerging work on a material) and when not to use (for published articles, use OpenAlex tools). Clearly guides the agent toward alternative sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.