get_alloy_nuance_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool retrieves detailed info, implying a read-only operation, but does not explicitly state behavioral traits such as safety, idempotency, or error conditions. The verb 'récupère' hints at read-only, but more explicit disclosure would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the action and provides essential details about the output without redundancy. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately explains the return content (composition, mesures, états, usages, normes). The single parameter is documented. However, it lacks mention of error handling, authentication, or any limitations, which would make it more complete for a simple get-by-id operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter 'id' described as 'L'id de la nuance d'alliage à récupérer'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'récupère' (retrieve), the resource 'détail complet d'une nuance d'alliage', and the key identifier 'par son id'. It lists the included aspects (composition, mesures, états, usages, normes), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_alloy_nuances (list) and get_alloy_types (types).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, conditions, or contrast with sibling tools (get_alloy_nuances, get_alloy_types).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.