Skip to main content
Glama

gograph_httpcalls

Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists all outbound HTTP client calls in a Go codebase using net/http package-level functions. Optionally filter by method, URL, or function name.

Instructions

Find all outbound HTTP client calls detected in the codebase via net/http package-level functions: http.Get, http.Post, http.PostForm, http.Head. Requires .gograph/graph.json — run gograph build . first. Read-only; no side effects. Optional term filters by method, URL, or function name substring. WHEN TO USE: When auditing external API dependencies, understanding which services your code calls, or identifying all outbound HTTP traffic. NOT TO USE: For HTTP server route definitions (use gograph_routes). RETURNS: List of HTTP method, URL, static path segments, dynamic flag, calling function, and file/line; empty when no HTTP client calls match.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
termNoOptional filter term (matches method, URL, or function name — e.g., 'POST' or 'api.example.com')
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint. Description reinforces read-only nature and adds prerequisite and return structure context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with clear sections, but slightly verbose; could be more concise while retaining clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, prerequisites, return format, and usage guidance. Lacks mention of error handling if graph.json missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The one optional parameter 'term' is well-described in schema and description adds 'substring' but does not significantly exceed schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool finds outbound HTTP client calls via net/http functions. Lists specific functions and distinguishes from sibling gograph_routes for server routes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit WHEN TO USE and NOT TO USE sections, directing to gograph_routes for server routes. Also states prerequisite of gograph build.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ozgurcd/gograph'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server