Skip to main content
Glama
owayo

https://github.com/owayo/gitlab-mcp-server

by owayo

Related Servers

Alternatives to https://github.com/owayo/gitlab-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for GitLab integration, enabling AI assistants to manage projects, merge requests, pipelines, issues, releases, and more.
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with GitLab repositories, allowing tasks like managing merge requests, searching projects, and creating comments through RESTful API integration.
      7 npm
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with self-hosted GitLab instances through 30 specialized tools. It supports managing projects, merge requests, CI/CD pipelines, and repository operations via the GitLab REST API v4.
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for GitLab integration, written in TypeScript. This server allows you to interact with GitLab merge requests, commits, pipelines, and jobs through MCP tools.
      11 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for GitLab and Jira integration. This server allows AI agents like gemini-cli to interact with your GitLab and Jira instances.
      32
      6 npm
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_pipeline_failed_jobs targets pipeline failures, get_review_changes targets MR file diffs, and get_review_comments targets MR unresolved comments. There is no overlap in functionality or ambiguity between these three tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and snake_case formatting (get_pipeline_failed_jobs, get_review_changes, get_review_comments). The naming convention is perfectly uniform across all tools.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 3 tools, this server feels severely under-scoped for a GitLab integration. While the tools are coherent, a typical GitLab MCP server would need many more operations (e.g., list projects, create MRs, trigger pipelines) to be useful. The count is too low for the apparent domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is extremely incomplete for GitLab operations. It only provides three specific 'get' operations for pipelines and MRs, missing all CRUD/lifecycle coverage (no create, update, delete, or listing operations). Agents will encounter dead ends when trying to perform basic GitLab workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues