smart_patch
Apply targeted fixes to a Google Apps Script project by providing the script ID and describing the issue.
Instructions
スマートパッチ(smart_fix_scriptのエイリアス)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| script_id | Yes | ||
| issue_description | Yes |
Apply targeted fixes to a Google Apps Script project by providing the script ID and describing the issue.
スマートパッチ(smart_fix_scriptのエイリアス)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| script_id | Yes | ||
| issue_description | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits, such as side effects, permissions, or return behavior. The alias statement implies identical behavior to smart_fix_script but does not elaborate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely brief (one phrase) but is underspecified and fails to convey necessary information. Conciseness should not sacrifice completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, annotations, and detailed description, the tool definition is completely inadequate for an agent to understand its behavior, parameters, or differentiation from siblings.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has two parameters with no descriptions, and schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no meaning or clarification about what script_id or issue_description represent.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description only states that smart_patch is an alias for smart_fix_script, without indicating its own purpose or what it does. It does not provide a verb or resource, making it uninformative for an agent.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use smart_patch versus sibling tools like smart_fix_script, apply_patch, or others. The description lacks any context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/overdozer1124/claude-appsscript-pro'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server