Skip to main content
Glama
outerwang

robot-motion-mcp

by outerwang

Related Servers

Alternatives to robot-motion-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables inspecting ROS 2 manipulators, computing kinematics, planning motion, and managing primitive MoveIt planning-scene objects via a typed API, with no physical execution support.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect operational status and channels, lint human-reviewed plans, search and query ledger data, and run queue-based writes with dry-run defaults and safeguards against unverified or unapproved campaigns.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets an AI agent inspect a ROS2 graph, its underlying DDS participants, readers, writers and QoS mismatches, and recorded bag files, with twelve typed tools that behave the same against a live robot or built-in mock fixtures. It has no write path at all, so it can never publish to the bus or command a robot.
      16
      350 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve source-linked robotics projects, bills of materials, and technical components, compare components, and validate RPPS documents via a remote MCP endpoint.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action/resource: listing tasks, reading task details, reading frozen experiment reports, starting a planning run, polling run status, and validating a run's path. The frozen-report versus live-run-status split is clearly described and unlikely to be confused.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use snake_case with a clear verb_noun pattern: list_tasks, get_task_info, get_experiment_report, start_motion_plan, get_plan_status, validate_motion. The convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a motion-planning server: task inspection, report reading, run initiation, status polling, and validation are each represented exactly once. There is no redundant or filler tool.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: discover tasks, inspect them, start a plan, poll status, and validate results. Minor gaps remain, such as canceling/stopping an in-flight planning run or listing available runs/reports directly.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues