Skip to main content
Glama
ottonic

Review MCP Server

by ottonic

Related Servers

Alternatives to Review MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local engineering workflow management by consolidating tickets, QA evidence, time tracking, root cause investigation, knowledge, and reporting into a single SQLite database, allowing generation of complete ticket packages for handoffs, dailies, or career evidence.
      23
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables multi-project workspaces to share structured notes, API contracts, and handoff messages via a local SQLite database, with versioning and read tracking.
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables security analysts to carry structured investigation state across sessions by storing typed observations, hypotheses, tasks, evidence and versioned decisions in a local SQLite graph with full-text search. It also enforces authorized scope and request controls, redacted and content-hashed evidence, duplicate-test signatures and validation gates that leave findings in draft until reproducibly confirmed, then produces technical and executive reports for Antigravity, Codex and other stdio MCP clients.
      20
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables clients to index and search reviewed Markdown and text documents with SQLite FTS5, read sources and prompts, manage explicit notes, and query a local Ollama assistant that uses permitted tools.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables engineering agents to maintain persistent knowledge across sessions by storing decisions, invariants, gotchas, and rejected ideas, with staleness detection, conflict detection, full-text search, and structured context assembly.
      37
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to persist and retrieve ADR-style decisions and machine-checkable constraints as git-friendly markdown in a repository, linked to requirement ids, tests and commits. Agents can pull relevant context before a task, check a proposed change against accepted constraints before committing, and record, supersede or search decisions over a local stdio connection.
      7
      143 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The set is organized as two parallel pairs: recall/remember operate on reviews (features and notes), while recall_decisions/remember_decision operate on decisions with requirement-checks as a basis. Descriptions make the boundary explicit, though the near-identical verb stems mean an agent skimming names could still pick recall when it wants recall_decisions. forget is the only tool spanning both domains, but its description clarifies how to target features, entity notes, or decision subjects.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are all lowercase snake_case with verb-first construction, and the pattern is readable: base verbs (recall, remember, forget) for reviews, and the same verbs plus a _decision(s) suffix for decisions. Minor deviation: singular remember_decision paired with plural recall_decisions breaks the symmetry, and forget has no _decision counterpart despite handling decisions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is tightly scoped to a persistent-memory server: two write paths, two read paths, and one delete. Each tool earns its place and there is no redundancy. Nothing feels missing or bloated for the stated purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    Full lifecycle is covered for both domains — create (remember, remember_decision), read (recall, recall_decisions), delete (forget) — with 'update' handled through documented replace-on-rewrite semantics, which is a valid design. Minor gaps: there is no way to enumerate or export all saved reviews/decisions without supplying an ArtifactRef, and no cross-artifact or cross-revision listing operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues