delete_layout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the burden. It explicitly says it deletes saved workspaces, which conveys destructive nature. It also mentions it deletes both layouts and workspaces saved by different tools. However, it doesn't describe error handling or permissions, so a 4 seems appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences long, front-loaded with the core action, and every sentence adds value: action, legacy context, and usage guidance. No redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description provides sufficient context: what it does, when to use it, where to find names, and an alternative. It doesn't explain return values or error behavior, but such details are less critical for a straightforward delete operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema_description_coverage, the description compensates by explaining that the 'name' parameter refers to a saved workspace and that existing names can be found via get_state. This adds semantic meaning beyond the schema's bare 'name' property.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Delete the saved workspace with that name', which clearly defines the action and object. It also clarifies the scope by mentioning both save_layout and save_workspace, leaving no ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides usage guidance: 'Use it to clean up saved workspaces that are no longer wanted' and points to get_state for existing names. It also gives an alternative for new integrations (delete_workspace), which helps decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.