Skip to main content
Glama
ossmalaysia

codex-local-mcp

by ossmalaysia

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-local-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT conversations to directly inspect local workspaces and delegate coding tasks to a local Codex agent, with controlled concurrency, reusable sessions, and task/usage tracking.
      587 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible coding agents to execute the local Codex CLI as a coding agent, including code reviews, session resume/fork, and CLI diagnostics.
      9
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants like Claude to the Codex CLI for code analysis, editing, and execution. Supports file references with @ syntax, sandboxed code execution with approval workflows, and structured code changes for automated refactoring and documentation.
      8
      93 npm
      178
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables external AI (ChatGPT, Claude) to securely access a local workspace via Cloudflare Tunnel, providing file operations, shell commands, Git operations, and more with bearer token authentication and sandbox isolation.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to a local Codex engine for performing deep, project-level code reviews and automated refactoring. It enables context-aware bug fixes and multi-file analysis through a standardized bridge between modern AI clients and local development environments.
      4
      2
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: running a coding task, generating images, polling async job results, and reading workspace artifacts. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the codex_ prefix, but the pattern is inconsistent: codex_run and codex_generate_image are verb-led, codex_read_artifact is verb_noun, while codex_job_result is noun_noun. The naming is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a compact but reasonable set for a local Codex CLI integration. Each tool serves a necessary function in the workflow, though the surface is slightly minimal.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of submitting a task, polling for results, and reading generated artifacts is covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to cancel a running job or list available workspace files, but these are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues