create_backlink

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the action (create) and the return value (JSON object with created backlink data). However, it does not mention potential errors, idempotency, or permission requirements, which keeps it slightly below a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-organized with Args, Returns, and Examples sections. It is reasonably concise for an 8-parameter tool, with the example adding practical value without excessive verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, return values are covered. The description fully documents parameters and provides an example. It lacks usage context (e.g., prerequisites like the campaign existing), but is otherwise complete for a create operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description explicitly explains every parameter, e.g., 'The campaign to associate the backlink with' and 'Anchor text of the link (optional)'. This adds significant meaning beyond the raw schema, though some explanations are brief (e.g., 'Backlink title').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create a new backlink in AgencyAnalytics' with a clear verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_backlink and update_backlink by indicating creation specifically.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage via the create verb, but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives (e.g., update_backlink for modifying existing backlinks). There is no when/when-not guidance, but the context of creation is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.