hotmail-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to hotmail-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives Claude read/write access to a personal Hotmail/Outlook.com mailbox via the Microsoft Graph API, exposing tools for listing, searching, sending, and drafting emails.611 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude to manage Outlook emails, including reading, sending, organizing, drafting, and bulk operations via Microsoft Graph API.15 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for Claude that reads Outlook emails its attachments through the Microsoft Graph API.619MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Python-based MCP server for Microsoft Outlook integration using Microsoft Graph API, enabling email reading/sending, calendar management, and contact operations through Claude Desktop.1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude Code and Codex full control of a personal Outlook.com mailbox and calendar via the Microsoft Graph API, enabling mail, draft, folder, and calendar operations through natural language.311MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Claude to a personal Microsoft Outlook mailbox via Microsoft Graph, providing tools for mail, calendar, contacts, tasks, and settings with a strong security model.121 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource. The PREVIEW/COMMIT pattern clearly separates proposal from execution, and list/read/search tools are unambiguous. No significant overlap between tools like propose_move, propose_delete, and propose_flag_as_junk is resolved by explicit folder targeting.
Most tools follow a consistent 'verb_noun' pattern (list_folders, propose_rule, apply_move). However, there are minor deviations: auth_status and compose_status lack a verb, and confirm_restore_rules breaks the 'apply_' convention. These are isolated exceptions in an otherwise orderly naming scheme.
25 tools is on the higher end, but each tool serves a distinct purpose within mailbox, rules, and junk management. The complexity of email workflows justifies the count, and no tool feels redundant. Slight over-scoping is acceptable given the domain.
The tool set covers core CRUD for rules, messages (search, read, move, delete), drafts (propose, apply, send), and junk detection. Missing features like marking read/unread or flagging are minor gaps. The reverse/backup mechanisms for moves and rules add robustness.