Skip to main content
Glama
orssdev

google-keep-mcp

by orssdev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to google-keep-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • NotesKeep MCP Server

      mariomosca
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage their notes on NotesKeep directly through Claude Code or other MCP clients. It supports creating, updating, and organizing both text and checklist notes using natural language commands.
      14
      5 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Keep MCP

      feuerdev
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Google Keep notes through an MCP server, allowing users to search, create, update, and delete notes via natural language commands.
      23
      161 PyPI
      107
      MIT

    • Keep Context

      spidey889
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to search, read, and organize your Google Keep notes through read-only MCP tools, including full note retrieval, label listing, recent-note browsing, and task extraction. Notes refresh automatically from your connected account without any local database or write access.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    list_notes and delete_note target completely distinct actions with no overlap. An agent can easily choose the right tool based on the operation needed.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_notes, delete_note). The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a Google Keep integration. The count is borderline but not absurdly small.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface lacks essential operations like creating, updating, or fetching a single note by ID. Only list and delete are supported, leaving significant workflow gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources