A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server allows users to manage and interact with a note system through Model Context Protocol, enabling note creation and summarization with URIs and metadata.
1
MIT
PulseMCP Server
by orliesaurus
Related Servers
Alternatives to PulseMCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server allows users to manage a simple notes system through creating and summarizing text notes using Model Context Protocol (MCP).1,026 npm8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes via URIs and tools.1210 npm8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that enables users to manage text notes with features like note creation and summary generation using a Model Context Protocol.1-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, providing resources for accessing notes via URIs, tools for creating notes, and prompts for generating summaries.75 npm-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server implements a simple notes system, allowing the creation, listing, and summarization of text notes using MCP concepts with note:// URIs and metadata.1-
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: list_integrations targets integrations, while list_servers targets MCP servers. There is no overlap in functionality or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the desired resource.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'list_' as the prefix, using snake_case throughout. This predictability enhances readability and reduces cognitive load for agents when scanning the tool set.
Tool Count2/5
With only 2 tools, the server feels under-scoped for a PulseMCP Server, which might imply broader functionality. While the tools are clear, the count is too low to cover a comprehensive domain, potentially limiting agent capabilities without additional context.
Completeness2/5
The tool set is severely incomplete for a server likely intended to manage integrations and servers. There are no CRUD operations (e.g., create, update, delete) or detailed actions (e.g., get specific integration/server), leaving significant gaps that could cause agent failures in handling lifecycle tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive