mcp-feedback-enhanced-community-fix
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-feedback-enhanced-community-fix
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Open Feedback, enabling AI assistants to submit, list, get, update status of, and analyze product feedback via a local HTTP API and JSONL storage.346 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server provides a browser-based board for managing threaded feedback sessions with an agent, enabling users to respond to multiple review findings or questions at their own pace with quick replies and batched submission.20MIT

featurejet-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOfficial MCP server for FeatureJet, enabling agents to read and act on customer feedback boards: list/search posts, file feature requests, and pull top-voted planned items.MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn advanced MCP server that provides interactive feedback mechanisms with support for various feedback types, multi-language capabilities, and team collaboration features for AI tools like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.41MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a web-based interactive feedback server for MCP, replacing desktop GUI with a browser interface supporting full CJK input and bilingual UI.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes App Store Connect TestFlight beta feedback including screenshot submissions, crash submissions, crash logs, and screenshot downloads as tools for MCP-capable clients.2BSD 3-Clause
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools serve entirely distinct purposes: one retrieves system information, the other collects feedback. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case ('get_system_info' and 'interactive_feedback'), making them predictable.
With only two tools, the server feels minimal. However, for a focused feedback-collection purpose with a system info utility, the count is acceptable, though many servers would offer more.
The server covers its stated domain (feedback collection and system info) adequately. The feedback tool is designed for repeated use mid-task, so no additional CRUD tools are needed. Minor gap: no way to retrieve past feedback, but rules imply continuous interaction.