set_daita

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains that DAITA adds padding to WireGuard traffic to defeat traffic analysis, which gives some behavioral context. It also states the return value. However, with no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing side effects, permissions, or rate limits, which are not mentioned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with three short paragraphs. The first sentence states the purpose, followed by a brief explanation of DAITA, then parameter and return descriptions. Every sentence adds value with no repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description is nearly complete. It explains the feature, parameter, and return value. However, it lacks usage guidelines or notes on when to use this tool, which would enhance completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema defines 'enabled' as a boolean with no description. The tool's description adds semantic meaning: 'True to enable, False to disable.' This compensates for the 0% schema description coverage and clarifies the parameter's effect.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: enabling or disabling DAITA. The verb 'set' is implied by the name, and the description specifies the action. It distinguishes from sibling tools like set_dns or set_killswitch by focusing on the DAITA feature, but it does not explicitly contrast with other settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to enable or disable DAITA versus using other tools or under what circumstances the feature should be toggled. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or alternatives, leaving the agent to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.