get_version_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions 'check if updates are available', which implies a network call to GitHub, but it does not clarify that this may involve rate limits, latency, or that the tool might fail if offline. No side effects or authentication requirements are noted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no fluff. Every word is necessary and contributes directly to understanding the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description should indicate what the tool returns (e.g., version string, update status). It does not. Also, the sibling check_for_updates exists but is not distinguished. For a simple tool with one optional param, the lack of output description and sibling differentiation makes it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% because the single parameter check_remote is described in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; it does not explain the parameter's effect (e.g., setting to false skips remote check). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'version information', and adds the action 'check if updates are available'. It distinguishes from siblings like get_rules_summary or update_rules, but does not explicitly differentiate from check_for_updates, which also checks updates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the sibling check_for_updates. The description implies a combined operation but does not list alternatives or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.