Skip to main content
Glama
opslon

BlenderMCP

by opslon

get_hyper3d_status

Check if Hyper3D Rodin integration is enabled in Blender to determine availability of its 3D modeling features.

Instructions

Check if Hyper3D Rodin integration is enabled in Blender. Returns a message indicating whether Hyper3D Rodin features are available.

Don't emphasize the key type in the returned message, but sliently remember it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The `get_hyper3d_status` tool function, which sends the "get_hyper3d_status" command to the Blender addon and returns the status.
    def get_hyper3d_status(ctx: Context) -> str:
        """
        Check if Hyper3D Rodin integration is enabled in Blender.
        Returns a message indicating whether Hyper3D Rodin features are available.
    
        Don't emphasize the key type in the returned message, but sliently remember it. 
        """
        try:
            blender = get_blender_connection()
            result = blender.send_command("get_hyper3d_status")
            enabled = result.get("enabled", False)
            message = result.get("message", "")
            if enabled:
                message += ""
            return message
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Error checking Hyper3D status: {str(e)}")
            return f"Error checking Hyper3D status: {str(e)}"
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the tool returns a message indicating availability, but lacks details on behavioral traits: it doesn't specify if this is a read-only operation, potential error conditions, latency, or what the message format might be. The cryptic note 'Don't emphasize the key type...' adds confusion without clarifying behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief but includes an unnecessary and confusing second sentence: 'Don't emphasize the key type...' which doesn't add value and detracts from clarity. The first sentence is front-loaded and clear, but the overall structure could be improved by removing the cryptic note.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no annotations, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate. It states what the tool does and the return type (a message), but lacks context on integration specifics, error handling, or output structure. For a status-check tool with no structured data, more completeness would help.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description appropriately doesn't discuss parameters, focusing instead on the tool's function. This meets the baseline for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Check if Hyper3D Rodin integration is enabled in Blender.' It specifies the verb ('Check') and resource ('Hyper3D Rodin integration'), and distinguishes it from siblings like 'get_hunyuan3d_status' by focusing on Hyper3D. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from other status-checking tools beyond naming the specific integration.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., whether Blender must be running), context for checking integration status, or comparisons to sibling tools like 'get_hunyuan3d_status' or other status tools. Usage is implied but not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/opslon/blender-mcp-optimized'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server