createShareLink

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description provides valuable behavioral info: rate-limiting (10 req/hour per IP) and the throwaway nature of the project. However, it does not disclose if deletion or expiration occurs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, all essential, with purpose front-loaded. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, usage, and rate limit, but given no output schema, it should mention what is returned (e.g., the generated link). This omission creates a gap for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% – all three parameters have descriptions in the schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter details beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a public review link for an HTML prototype' – a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings (listComments, uploadVersion) by emphasizing one-shot sharing, though it does not explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this for one-shot sharing of prototypes' and notes 'No project setup required – creates a brand-new throwaway project.' This gives clear context but does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.